AI receptionist for small business: calls, bookings and handoffs
What an AI receptionist does on a real call, the rules that apply, a sample greeting and a pass/fail checklist to launch one safely.
Every closed conversation scored against your own quality rubric, with coaching points surfaced automatically.
Most support teams review only a small sample of conversations, so coaching rests on whatever a manager happened to read. This workflow scores every closed conversation against the quality rubric you define, covering tone, accuracy and policy adherence, and explains the reason behind each score. Managers get specific coaching points for each agent, delivered to email, Slack or a web dashboard.

AI Support QA reviews closed tickets and conversations against the quality rubric you define, scoring tone, accuracy and policy adherence, and highlighting specific coaching points for each agent. It delivers a dashboard or recurring report to one channel. Every score comes with the reasons behind it.
Manual QA is slow and patchy: managers sample a handful of tickets, scores vary by reviewer, and agents receive feedback weeks after the conversation. Quality problems slip through until a customer complains. After launch, every conversation is scored consistently, patterns become visible across the team, and coaching focuses on real examples. The Scope Card sets the rubric, data sources and delivery channel before you order, so you know exactly how quality is measured and who receives the reports.
AI Support QA scores closed tickets and conversations against your own rubric for tone, accuracy and policy. Results arrive in one dashboard or recurring report, covering far more than a hand-picked sample.
Every score comes with the reasons behind it and specific coaching points for each agent. Team leads can run coaching sessions with real examples instead of general impressions.
Policy adherence is part of the rubric, and up to five alerts can flag repeated misses. A lead can spot a pattern, such as a wrong refund rule, while it is still fresh.
Your portal lists these the moment you order. Delivery starts the working day after everything is in and your access is checked.
| Option | Delivery time | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | 20–30 working days | $3,900 |
| Express | 15–25 working days | $4,600 |
| Rush | 10–20 working days | $5,250 |
Before you start: Note how many tickets leads review by hand each week and your current reopen rate. Write down the rubric you use today, even an informal one.
These are things to track, not promised results. Outcomes depend on your data, your team and your market.
The build price is one-time. Running AI Support QA costs roughly $20 to $150 a month, covering AI model usage and hosting or scheduling. Higher ticket volume and more frequent reporting both push you toward the top of that range.
AI usage during the build and every month after runs through your own accounts, so the cost and the provider relationship both stay visible.
Ask about running costsNeed more than three read-only data sources, more than twenty-five metrics, or a report format this Scope Card does not cover? Add a note at checkout for a written Change Quote. Larger or bespoke projects go through the Custom AI request form instead.
Request a custom versionMonthly maintenance covers monitoring, fixes and change hours for work such as a new metric or an adjusted rubric weighting. It starts after the post-launch support period, bills monthly and can be cancelled any month.
$249/mo (the minimum fee, includes 2 change hours)
Optional. Starts after the post-launch support period. Cancel any month.
How maintenance works| Do it yourself with a SaaS tool | Hire a custom agency | Upmark Labs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | A QA scoring add-on bills per seat or per reviewed conversation | A custom agency quotes after discovery calls | Ours is one fixed price, shown on this page before you buy |
| Scope | A generic QA tool needs your rubric configured metric by metric by hand | An agency agrees scope during the project | Ours is written on the Scope Card before purchase |
| Delivery | A QA add-on can connect in days but scores against a generic default rubric first | An agency build usually takes several weeks, set per project | Ours has a fixed delivery time shown before you buy, with faster options |
| Coaching detail | Most tools give a single overall score with little explanation | An agency build depends on what was agreed | Ours surfaces specific coaching points tied to each conversation |
Every closed ticket or conversation in your connected data sources, on the schedule you set, not just a manual sample. That is the main advantage over a manager spot-checking a handful each week. Scores and coaching points are produced consistently across your full ticket volume.
Roughly $20 to $150 a month, covering AI model usage and hosting or scheduling. Higher ticket volume and more frequent reports both sit toward the top of that range. You pay this directly in your own accounts, with no separate per-conversation fee from us.
Delivery runs on a fixed schedule from a verified intake, and the exact date is shown in the delivery panel before you buy, with express and rush options if you need it sooner. All three include checking results against three months of your historical data before the QA scoring goes live for your team.
Read-only access to up to three data sources, typically your helpdesk and any call or chat transcript system. Nothing is written back to those systems. Credentials are shared by adding our team as a user or creating a key you control, never by email, and access can be revoked at any time you choose.
We check the build against three months of your own historical data and review the results with you before anything goes live. If scores do not match how your team actually judges quality, that feedback goes into one of the two included rounds of changes.
Yes, through monthly maintenance. Its change hours cover work such as adding a metric or reweighting the rubric, and you can cancel any month if your reporting needs stay fairly stable. Share the updated rubric and metric definitions, even if informal. Maintenance also covers monitoring and fixes, and starts after the post-launch support period.
No, this build reviews conversations only after they have closed, scoring them against your rubric. If you want AI assisting agents while a ticket is still open, drafting replies and surfacing articles in real time, see AI Support Copilot, which is built specifically for that in-conversation, assistive role.
Order AI Support QA and every closed conversation is scored against your rubric, giving managers fair, consistent coaching points for each agent.

Finds gaps in your help center and drafts new articles from resolved tickets, connected natively to Freshdesk so it reads and updates…

Finds gaps in your help center and drafts new articles from resolved tickets, connected natively to Intercom so it reads and updates…

Finds gaps in your help center and drafts new articles from resolved tickets, connected natively to Zendesk so it reads and updates…